Ikumi Yamazaki vs Naomi Xu Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
Published on 03 Jul at 04:39 AM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
I. Yamazaki vs N. Xu

JPN
1
Win
Played
0
Win

CAN
1
Win
Played
0
Win
Head-to-head: Yamazaki 1 - 0 Xu
They have played 2 sets in total, with Ikumi Yamazaki winning 2 and Naomi Xu winning 0. The last match between Ikumi Yamazaki and Naomi Xu was at the W15 Hong Kong, 03-07-2025, Round: R2, Surface: Hard, with Ikumi Yamazaki getting the victory 6-0 6-1.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Yamazaki | 1 |
| Xu | 0 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(R2) W15 Hong Kong(07-03-25)
I. Yamazaki vs N. Xu H2H Profile
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| $0 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 60.93% (131-84) | Career Total W/L | 53.33% (16-14) |
| 1 | Hard | 0 |
| 3 | Titles | 0 |
| 1 | Total H2H Matches | 0 |
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
I. Yamazaki vs N. Xu Match Preview:
- In the last six months, Xu's second serve win rate is 40%, slightly higher than Yamazaki's 37.55%. Could this slight edge influence the match outcome?
- Regarding return games, Yamazaki has a small advantage in winning 52.59% of opponents' second serve points compared to Xu's 51.82%. Will this affect the match dynamic?
- Xu effectively returns first serves with a 42.31% success rate, surpassing Yamazaki's 36.92%, indicating a slight advantage here for Xu.
- Under pressure, Xu saves 50.59% of breakpoints, outperforming Yamazaki who saves 43.15%. How crucial is this ability in clutch moments?
- Overall, Xu's match win rate over the last year is 66.67% (8/4), higher than Yamazaki's 56.45% (35/27), which could imply a performance edge for Xu.
- Xu excels on Clay with a 63% win rate (5/3), while Yamazaki is unbeatable on Grass with a 100% win rate (7/0). Will the match's surface influence the result?
- Xu's challenger-level matches over the past year have a 57.14% win rate, slighlty ahead of Yamazaki's 55.74% on similar tour levels.
- Facing stronger competition, Xu's average opponent rank is 249.58, superior to Yamazaki's 445.27, which might give Xu the upper hand in experience.
- Xu wins 67% of deciding sets, a bit more than Yamazaki's 60%, possibly giving Xu a confidence boost in tight situations.
- Break point conversion stands at 45.16% for Xu, ahead of Yamazaki who converts 40.5% of opportunities, which might be decisive in pivotal moments.
Editorial Prediction (July 3, 2025, UTC):
Based on recent statistics, Xu demonstrates a consistent edge in several key areas. Their ability to win a higher percentage of second serve points and their superior performance in saving breakpoints puts them in a strong position.
Xu's proficiency in returning first serves and their experience against higher-ranked opponents also suggests an advantage. Although Yamazaki leads marginally in certain return stats, Xu's overall match and breakpoint conversion rates stand out.
Given these factors, Xu appears poised to secure a victory in this upcoming encounter, given their proven track record in performance efficiencies across the board.
Ikumi Yamazaki vs Naomi Xu Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
I. Yamazaki vs N. Xu H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 12 | Games Won | 1 |
| 3 | Total Double Faults | 1 |
| 1:9:54 | Average Match Time | 1:9:54 |
| 74% (31/42) | 1st Serve % | 68% (23/34) |
| 68% (21/31) | 1st Serve Win % | 30% (7/23) |
| 73% (8/11) | 2nd Serve Win % | 9% (1/11) |
| 67% (6/9) | Break Pts Won % | 50% (1/2) |
| 76% (26/34) | Return Points Win % | 31% (13/42) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
Recent Performance Stats
I. Yamazaki Recent Matches Played
N. Xu Recent Matches Played

I. Yamazaki vs N. Xu Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 60.93% (131/84) | YTD Win/Loss | 53.33% (16/14) |
| 58.57% (287/203) | Sets Win/Loss | 56.72% (38/29) |
| 53.27% (2360/2070) | Games Win/Loss | 52.71% (302/271) |
| 55.34% (57/46) | Hard Win/Loss | 52.38% (11/10) |
| 67.53% (52/25) | Clay Win/Loss | 62.50% (5/3) |
| 53.57% (15/13) | Indoor Hard W/L | 0.00% (0/1) |
| 100.00% (7/0) | Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) |
| 0.07 | Aces Per Game | 0.07 |
| 148 | Aces Total | 20 |
| 0.27 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.21 |
| 578 | Total Double Faults | 59 |
| 1:29:13 | Average Match Time | 1:34:24 |
| 429.22 | Average Opponent Rank | 268.03 |
| 69% (8206/11899) | 1st Serve % | 66% (934/1407) |
| 58% (4728/8206) | 1st Serve Win % | 54% (507/934) |
| 44% (1613/3693) | 2nd Serve Win % | 44% (208/473) |
| 50% (813/1633) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 51% (97/192) |
| 48% (5788/12074) | Return Points Win % | 47% (685/1467) |
| 0.00% (0/1) | Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 59.76% (98/66) | Challenger W/L | 50.00% (6/6) |
| 66.00% (33/17) | Futures W/L | 55.56% (10/8) |
| 61% (128/211) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 55% (16/29) |
| 100% (2/2) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 63% (20/32) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 100% (3/3) |
| 57% (35/61) | Deciding Set Win % | 25% (2/8) |
| 91% (119/108) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 78% (18/14) |
| 9% (119/11) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 22% (18/4) |
| 24% (95/23) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 17% (12/2) |